• Advertisement

PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Getting the best performance from your Isuzu, the in's and out's

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby Roderunner » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:23 am

I tried injecting water/meth in my previous diesel engine some years ago, using a windscreen washer bottle/pump. 25% meth 75% water worked well, a 50/50 mix resulted in some pretty loud pinging along with an extra 25% more power. Injecting before the turbo usually results in a damaged compressor wheel so after the turbo and intercooler is the recommended place to plumb in the spray nozzle.
Roderunner
Isuzu Senior
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:58 pm
Location: Central highlands
Age: 48
Country: Australia
City: Melbourne
Vehicle: 93 Jackaroo

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby geeves » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:29 am

how did you control it? Does a windscreen washer pump still spray at full boost?
Sanding your knuckles before starting work can help. That way you cant skin them
User avatar
geeves
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8964
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 1:36 pm
Location: Rangiora
Age: 63
Country: NZ
City: Rangiora
Vehicle: 94 bighorn 4jg2
2013 Subaru XV

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby MrRevhead » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:32 am

I don't imagine a washer bottle system would be the best. Not enough pressure to atomise. But could be a good test bed to see if a more exspenive system is worth it
MrRevhead
Isuzu Guru
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:57 pm
Age: 35
Country: New Zealand
City: Nelson
Vehicle: 93 MU 2.8

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby Roderunner » Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:13 pm

geeves wrote:how did you control it? Does a windscreen washer pump still spray at full boost?

I used the jet from a petrol carburettor to limit flow, and injected before the turbo as I was only experimenting for a few weeks. If you inject post turbo then a one way valve needs to be placed in the line so that boost pressure doesn't force water/metho back into the washer bottle, if you inject pre turbo then be careful that the water doesn't get sucked into the intake tract (when the system is turned off) by the vacuum created when the engine is revving high. I used a toggle switch to turn the washer motor on, the water/metho was only going to be for short bursts of power when overtaking etc., I did plan on mounting a push button switch on the gear lever knob but decided to save for a professional injection system instead. Here's some interesting info: http://www.dieselpowermag.com/tech/1005 ... ewall.html
Roderunner
Isuzu Senior
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:58 pm
Location: Central highlands
Age: 48
Country: Australia
City: Melbourne
Vehicle: 93 Jackaroo

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby gomulletgo » Thu Nov 27, 2014 2:00 am

Just started learning about this stuff, I find it really interesting.

Most people know that water into a diesel can hydraulic and destroy an engine :shock: To think you could get performance gains by just injecting water into the intake is amazing.

I've read a bit about it but one thing that I can't make sense of is this, in physics: energy is never lost only transferred. So when the fine water mist is sprayed into the intake air the water mist absorbs the heat from the surrounding air before it enters the engine, seems fair.....but now the heated mist also enters the engine, as the heat energy has only moved from the air to the water mist the same amount of heat should enter the engine :? :?:

Intercoolers, radiators etc. All transfer the heat to another area that does not enter the engine intake, which makes sense.
gomulletgo
Isuzu Senior
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:33 pm
Age: 27
Country: New Zealand
City: CHCH
Vehicle: 89 bighorn 2.8ITD Manual LWB,
93 bighorn 3.1ITD Manual LWB.

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby MrRevhead » Thu Nov 27, 2014 5:25 am

You are introducing water which is much cooler than the incoming air.
What happens when you have a sink half full of hot water and add cold water?

There is a little more to the power gains than just cooling as well
MrRevhead
Isuzu Guru
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:57 pm
Age: 35
Country: New Zealand
City: Nelson
Vehicle: 93 MU 2.8

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby geeves » Thu Nov 27, 2014 2:47 pm

water cools the mixture but also on petrol cars prevents detonation so you can run more advance which is where the power comes from. Dont know how it works on diesels as diesel doesnt detonate without a lot of provocation.
Sanding your knuckles before starting work can help. That way you cant skin them
User avatar
geeves
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8964
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 1:36 pm
Location: Rangiora
Age: 63
Country: NZ
City: Rangiora
Vehicle: 94 bighorn 4jg2
2013 Subaru XV

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby gomulletgo » Thu Nov 27, 2014 4:37 pm

Thanks guys :) ,

That makes sense, the water would be cooler than the intake charge after the turbo but I can't see water temp being much different to inlet air temp pre-turbo unless the water is cooled somehow. Also I wonder how much heat soak from the manifold to the spray nozzle affects the water temp prior to injection.

I've also read about the cleaning effects of water injection, with the amount of blowby of the 4JB1-T engines I can imagine water getting past the rings, into the crank case, mixing with the oil and making a brown sludge that would make you think you've got a blown headgasket. If this oil/water mixing does happen it can't be good for engine lubrication.
gomulletgo
Isuzu Senior
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:33 pm
Age: 27
Country: New Zealand
City: CHCH
Vehicle: 89 bighorn 2.8ITD Manual LWB,
93 bighorn 3.1ITD Manual LWB.

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby MrRevhead » Thu Nov 27, 2014 4:47 pm

You only inject a tiny amount! No where enough for that
MrRevhead
Isuzu Guru
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:57 pm
Age: 35
Country: New Zealand
City: Nelson
Vehicle: 93 MU 2.8

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby gomulletgo » Sat Nov 29, 2014 1:04 pm

Thanks MrRevhead, from what I read online apparently a lot of water is injected, so much that apparently a 1 Gallon water tank (3.8L-4.5L) can be totally drained on one climb up a hill.
gomulletgo
Isuzu Senior
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:33 pm
Age: 27
Country: New Zealand
City: CHCH
Vehicle: 89 bighorn 2.8ITD Manual LWB,
93 bighorn 3.1ITD Manual LWB.

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby MrRevhead » Sat Nov 29, 2014 1:08 pm

That's masses more water than fuel
MrRevhead
Isuzu Guru
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:57 pm
Age: 35
Country: New Zealand
City: Nelson
Vehicle: 93 MU 2.8

Re: PETROL VS GAS VS WATER METH INJECTION

Postby gomulletgo » Sat Nov 29, 2014 4:31 pm

It does sound like heaps, perhaps they've got much bigger hills in the states. I think I read somewhere that people had 4-5 Gallon tanks of water to try and last them between diesel fills.
gomulletgo
Isuzu Senior
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:33 pm
Age: 27
Country: New Zealand
City: CHCH
Vehicle: 89 bighorn 2.8ITD Manual LWB,
93 bighorn 3.1ITD Manual LWB.

Previous

Return to Engines and Exhaust

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests